Skip to main content
  • IAASB Begins Work on Global Standards for ESG Assurance

    English

    New globally accepted standards aim to improve investor confidence and “reduce the risk of material misstatements”.

    The International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) has published a public consultation for its 2024-27 proposed strategy and work plan, with it wishing to develop an overarching standard for assurance on sustainability reporting.

    Read the full article at the ESG Investor website.

    ESG Investor

  • IAASB's Tom Seidenstein on an efficient accounting profession

    English

    Tom Seidenstein seems drawn to challenges. Before becoming chairperson of the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) he worked at Fannie Mae. An institution at the heart of the global financial crisis.   

    “A key theme from IAASB, to Fannie Mae, to the role I played at the IFRS Foundation from its founding to 2011 - is this idea of efficient markets. They require high-quality reporting supported by assurance and audit so that capital is allocated efficiently and increasingly with the eye towards greater sustainability.”

    Read the full article on the Accounting Weekly website (Compliance Week subscription requried).

    Accounting Weekly

  • IESBA Broadens Definition of Public Interest Entity

    English

    Auditors following global standards will want to review new guidance released by the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants that broadens the definition of a public interest entity and complements other recently revised provisions to the International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants.

    Read the full article on the Compliance Week website (Compliance Week subscription requried).

    Compliance Week article including comments from IAASB Chair

  • Q&A: IAASB Head on Audit's Role in Combating Fraud, ESG, New Technologies, More

    English

    Compliance Week caught up with Tom Seidenstein, chair of the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB), to talk about the independent organization’s current and future efforts to improve audit quality, the biggest challenges to audit confidence today, and what emerging issues might be around the corner.

    Read the full article on the Compliance Week website.

    Compliance Week interview with IAASB Chair Tom Seidenstein

  • 非財務の報告の発展に合わせた保証基準の開発

    Tom Seidenstein
    IAASB Chair
    Japanese

    国際監査・保証基準審議会(IAASB)は、先週行われた2021年3月の会議において、「拡張された外部報告(EER)に対する保証業務への国際保証業務基準3000(改訂)の適用に関する規範性のないガイダンス」(Non-Authoritative Guidance on Applying ISAE 3000 (Revised) to Extended External Reporting (EER) Assurance Engagements)(以下「本ガイダンス」という。)を承認した。本ガイダンスの公表は、4月を予定している。本ガイダンスは、非財務の報告に対する保証という発展途上にある分野を支援する上での大きな前進となる。EERは、サステナビリティ報告、ESG(環境・社会・ガバナンス)報告、統合報告、CSR報告、温室効果ガス報告、及び公共部門におけるサービス・パフォーマンス報告等、様々な形式の報告を包含している。 

    本ガイダンスは、十分な検証を経た既存の保証基準である国際保証業務基準(ISAE)3000(改訂)「過去財務情報の監査又はレビュー以外の保証業務」(以下「ISAE 3000(改訂)」という。)を基礎としつつ、EERに対する保証業務に当該基準を実際に適用する際に業務実施者や利用者が識別した課題に対応するために作成されたものである。

    ISAE 3000(改訂)及びISAE 3410「温室効果ガス報告に対する保証業務」(以下「ISAE 3410」という。)と併せ、本ガイダンスは、保証報告書の想定利用者からの信用を高め信頼性を改善するための強固な指針となる。IAASBとしては、両基準及び本ガイダンスは、欧州連合その他の地域で検討中の新しい報告体系に業務実施者が対応するに当たって十分な頑健性を備えているものと考えているが、当該基準等と実務との間に乖離が生じた場合には、直ちにこれを解消すべく取り組む所存である。 

    IAASBによるデュープロセスを経て本ガイダンスが承認されたことで、持続可能な開発のための世界経済人会議(WBCSD)の支援の下、2017年に開始されたプロジェクトは完結する。 

    拡張された外部報告及び非財務情報の報告への需要の高まりへの対応

    近年、企業報告において、非財務情報は重要なテーマとなっている。企業報告が進化するなかで、監査人によるサステナビリティ報告やESG報告への保証ニーズがますます増加している。従前、このような報告及び当該報告に対する保証は、企業によって自発的に行われるのが通例であったが、法令に基づきこれを義務化しようという動きに注目が高まり、昨今は更にその勢いが加速している。IAASBは、企業報告の利用者が、資本配分に関する意思決定に資するより広範な情報開示を求めているなか、この課題に取り組み、支援を行っていく所存である。

    本ガイダンスは、保証業務の包括基準であるISAE 3000(改訂)をEERに対する保証業務に適用する上で、主要な利害関係者が直面する10の主要課題に対応している。

    本ガイダンスが扱うトピックは、適切な適性及び能力の適用、

    職業的専門家としての懐疑心及び判断の行使、

    保証業務の前提条件等の包括的な事項から、

    より具体的な専門的事項にまで多岐にわたる。

     

    具体的な専門的事項の例としては、

    主題情報の作成に用いられる

    プロセスの検討(内部統制の理解を含む)、

    証拠の入手、虚偽表示の重要性及び

    保証報告書における有効なコミュニケーションがある。

     

    利害関係者からの強い要請を受け、本ガイダンスは、ISAE 3000(改訂)で検討されている限定的保証業務と合理的保証業務との区別に関する理解を促進するためのより詳細な説明及び具体例を盛り込んでいる。

    本ガイダンスの適用対象となる報告の名称を、ESGやその他一般に広く知られている報告ではなく、「拡張された外部報告(EER)」とした我々の選択を疑問に思う声もあろうが、これは本ガイダンスの影響範囲をより広範なものにしようという意図の現れである。ISAE 3000(改訂)は、冒頭で取り上げた様々な形式の非財務情報の報告を含む、過去財務情報の監査又はレビュー業務以外のあらゆる保証業務を適用対象としている。

    EER情報は、企業のアニュアルレポートやその他の主要な定期報告書若しくは規制当局への提出書類の一項目として、又は企業が発行する個別の報告書やステートメントとして開示される場合がある。同様に、保証業務が必要となった場合、保証の対象となるEER情報は、報告書全体、又は報告書内の一つ若しくは複数の指標、項目や記述である場合がある。ISAE 3000(改訂)及び本ガイダンスは、それら全てに対応している。

    EERに対する保証業務において必須となる品質へのコミットメント及び最高水準の倫理規程 

    本ガイダンスは、IAASBの規範性のある公表物であるISAE 3000(改訂)の適用を支援するものであり、当該基準の要求事項にはない追加的な要求事項を含んでおらず、また、当該基準の要求事項又は適用指針を無効化又は変更するものではない。保証業務の品質及び倫理に関する要求事項は、既に当該基準に深く組み込まれているということに留意することが重要である。

    ISAE 3000(改訂)の要求事項には、以下が含まれる。

    • 業務実施者は、国際品質管理基準第1号、又はこれと同程度以上の要求水準を有するその他の職業的専門家としての基準若しくは法令等の対象となる監査事務所に所属していること。当該事項は、2020年12月に公表されたIAASBの新規及び改訂された品質マネジメント基準に合わせて更新される予定である。
    • 業務実施者及び業務チームのメンバーは、国際会計士倫理基準審議会(IESBA)が公表した職業会計士のための国際倫理規程(国際独立性基準を含む)、又はこれと同程度以上の要求水準を有するその他の職業的専門家としての基準又は法令等の対象であること。
    • 業務実施者は、自身の能力(保証業務の技能及び技法を含む。)及びその他の業務実施者の能力に対処する基準の要求事項を遵守すること。

    正しい条件が存在することの確認

    業務実施者は、保証業務の前提条件が満たされている場合にのみ、ISAE 3000(改訂)に基づく保証契約の新規の受嘱又は更新を行うことが認められている。当該前提条件は、主題情報の利用者のニーズ及び当該情報の作成に当たって適用された規準(例えば、IASE3000(改訂)の要求事項を満たす報告フレームワークや一連の報告基準)の適切性等を踏まえた、保証業務に合理的な目的があるかどうかの判断等に関係するものである。

    本ガイダンスの多くの部分は、保証業務の前提条件が満たされているかどうかの判断に関するISAE 3000(改訂)の要求事項の運用に当たって業務実施者をサポートするための記述に割かれている。

    また、首尾一貫したサステナビリティ報告基準の策定に向けた近年の世界的動向も、適切な規準の提供による保証業務の前提条件を整備する取り組みを後押しするものとなろう。 

    追加のサポート資料

    本ガイダンスに関するパブリック・コンサルテーションの回答者から、特定の要素についての補足資料の公表を促す意見が多く寄せられたことを受け、本ガイダンスには、二つの補足資料が添付されている。特に、EERに対する保証業務に関するより詳細な実例の提供を望む声が多く、二つの規範性のないサポート資料を本ガイダンスと同時に公表することとした(注:これらの資料は本ガイダンスと一体不可分ではない。すなわち、本ガイダンスは当該資料を参照せずとも利用可能であり、当該資料は業務実施者が参照を希望する場合にのみ追加的なリソースとして利用可能なものであることに留意されたい)。このサポート資料には、①「EERに関する信用及び信頼モデル」(Credibility and Trust Model Relating to EER Reporting)及び②「EERに対する保証業務の主要な側面に関する設例」(Illustrative Examples of Selected Aspects of EER Assurance Engagements)があり、後者には、幅広い報告フレームワークを網羅した設例が掲載されている。

    今後の課題

    ISAE 3000(改訂)及びISAE 3410と併せ、本ガイダンスは、非財務情報の報告に関する品質保証業務に対して安定した成果を生むための確固とした基盤を提供するものである。一方で、急速に発展する当該分野におけるIAASBの活動は、本ガイダンスの公表で完結するものではないことも十分に認識している。

    IAASBは、当該分野の発展のためにIAASBの基準、フレームワーク及びガイダンスの拡充に取り組んでいく用意がある。今後も、関連動向を注視しつつ、アウトリーチ活動の一環として利害関係者との対話に取り組み、IAASBの基準及び国際的な監査・保証の基準設定主体としてのIAASBの役割に影響を及ぼす可能性のある政策協議への参加を図っていく所存である。

    This “ASSURANCE STANDARDS KEEPING PACE ON NON-FINANCIAL REPORTING” of the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB), published by the International Federation of Accountants in March 2021 in the English language, has been translated into Japanese by The Japanese Institute of Certified Public Accountants in April 2021, and is used with the permission of IFAC. The approved text of all IFAC publications is that published by IFAC in the English language. IFAC assumes no responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of the translation or for actions that may ensue as a result thereof.

    English language text of “ASSURANCE STANDARDS KEEPING PACE ON NON-FINANCIAL REPORTING” © 2020 by IFAC. All rights reserved.

    Japanese text of “ASSURANCE STANDARDS KEEPING PACE ON NON-FINANCIAL REPORTING” © 2021 by IFAC. All rights reserved.

    Original title: Assurance Standards Keeping Pace on Non-Financial Reporting

    Contact Permissions@ifac.org for permission to reproduce, store or transmit, or to make other similar uses of this document.

     

    2021年3月に国際会計士連盟(IFAC)の国際公会計基準審議会(IAASB)によって、英語で公表された「非財務の報告の発展に合わせた保証基準の開発」は、2021年4月に日本公認会計士協会によって日本語に翻訳され、IFACの許可を得て複製されている。全てのIFACの文書の正文は、IFACにより英語で公表されたものである。IFACは、翻訳の正確性と完全性、又はその結果として生じる可能性のある行動について一切の責任を負わない。

    英文“ASSURANCE STANDARDS KEEPING PACE ON NON-FINANCIAL REPORTING” © 2020 国際会計士連盟(IFAC)。無断複写複製を禁ずる。

    和文「非財務の報告の発展に合わせた保証基準の開発」© 2021 国際会計士連盟(IFAC)。無断複写複製を禁ずる。

    原題:Assurance Standards Keeping Pace on Non-Financial Reporting

    この文書を複製、保存、送信、又はその他の同様の用途に使用するためには、Permissions @ ifac.org へ問い合わせの上で許可を得なくてはならない。

     

    Assurance Standards Keeping Pace on Non-Financial Reporting

  • International Audit Chief Says New Rules a ‘Major Step’

    English

    New rules for how corporate auditors manage the quality of their own work are on their way. But many audit firms are worried that international standards will diverge from those in the U.S., leaving them to cope with a patchwork of do’s and don’ts.

    On this episode of Bloomberg Tax's weekly podcast, Talking Tax, host Amanda Iacone talks with IAASB Chair Tom Seidenstein. Tom explains how the IAASB developed its new auditing standards with the input of its US counterpart and why the standards should help shape a similar project in the US.

     

    Listen to Tom's interview

    Bloomberg Tax Podcast

  • Adapt. Assist. Collaborate. The IAASB's Approach to Standard Setting in the COVID Environment

    English

    In an article for the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, IAASB Chair Tom Seidenstein addresses COVID-19 and its devestating global challenge. The pandemic has taken and will take far too many lives and put extraordinary pressures on society in general. It has also greatly affected markets, business, and organizations, and the financial and external reporting ecosystem.

     

    Read Tom's article (p. 42)

  • Speech - Conference on Corruption, Keynote Remarks by Dr. Stavros Thomadakis

    Dr. Stavros Thomadakis
    Chairman, International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants
    English

    Madame Minister of Finance, Mr. President of the Association of National Accountants of Nigeria, esteemed representatives and colleagues, ladies and gentlemen.

    It is a pleasure and a privilege to address you today at this ANAN-PAFA-IFAC conference. I congratulate the organizers and thank the hosts for holding this very timely and useful event.

    The fight against illicit behavior and corrupt practice is a worldwide undertaking pursued by international organizations, public and private sector entities, civil society and organized professions.

    Accountants around the world are very important - I would say central - actors at the very heart of economic decisions, transactions and strategies. They can therefore play an enormous role in combatting all aspects of illegality and noncompliance with laws and regulations, and in freeing economies from the burdens caused by malfeasance. 

    The International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants is a valuable instrument in that combat. It also is one of the most explicit and broadly accepted Ethical Codes in the world, recognized also by other international professions.

    We at IESBA are working to maintain, enhance and promote The International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (including international independence standards). The Code is, as I said, a powerful instrument at the disposal of the global accounting profession.

    Promotion of faithful adherence to ethical behavior builds up a solid barrier against corrupt practice. Implementation of the Code’s provisions fortifies the international profession in resisting and  battling corruption.

    The Fundamental Principles of the Code - integrity, objectivity, due care and competence, professional behavior – provide a comprehensive armory in opposition both to corrupt intent and to illicit practice.

    The body of the provisions of the Code strongly encourages PAs to respond to illicit behaviors and corruption when they encounter them in the course of their duties. My colleague, Saadiya Adam, will expand on this theme and the Code’s more specific provisions in her presentation to follow.

    We are going through a difficult time because of the Covid pandemic and its dire health and economic consequences in all countries. We are witnessing universal efforts by governments around the world to boost the resilience of economies and societies as they are faced with this calamity.

    In this environment of pandemic, as in any crisis, it is unfortunate but true that opportunities and incentives for corruption, illicit, unethical practices are heightened. For example, many organizations, including governments, corporations and accounting firms had to pivot to virtual platforms very quickly, among other adjustments. This may have exposed their IT systems and infrastructures to more sophisticated corruption activities including cybercrime.

    Besides this, as many companies have to face unexpected and difficult financial challenges and as they seek government support, accountants offering their services in those activities must be very alert, diligent and vigilant that these arrangements are carried out within laws, regulations and the duty of due care.

    In response to all these heightened risks, IESBA has formed a CV-19 working group with a mandate to provide guidance to accountants on compliance with Code provisions in the current difficult circumstances. We have reached out for collaborations in this task and the results have already appeared.

    Let me mention for example two very recent and relevant staff publications that have been circulated by IESBA in collaboration with other stakeholder organizations:

    1. Issued jointly by the Staffs of the South African Independent Regulatory Board for Auditors, (IRBA) the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants (IESBA) and the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB), the paper titled, Navigating the Heightened Risks of Fraud and Other Illicit Activities During the COVID-19 Pandemic, including Considerations for Auditing Financial Statements
    2. Issued jointly by the Staffs of Chartered Professional Accountants of Canada (CPA Canada) and IESBA, the paper titled COVID-19 and Evolving Risks for Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Cybercrime.

    Hoping that the pandemic will quickly come under control, we have to look forward to opportunities and responsibilities as we return to normalcy. The IESBA, as a global standard setter will continue and enhance its work of engagement with stakeholders around the globe as a major strategic imperative.

    This engagement is a two-pronged activity. On one hand we engage to promote adoption and implementation of the Code, its revisions and its enhancements. This work has brought us into contacts with many stakeholders, such as yourselves, and we look forward to continued two-way communication and mutual awareness. 

    On the other hand, we seek close engagement with global stakeholders through our consultations processes which bring out contributions to our current standard-setting projects.

    We issue exposure drafts of proposed standards, we organize roundtables and present webinars on current work and, in short, we use all available means for eliciting stakeholder opinions and advices for our work.

    The success of all this is critical to an important strategic dimension that we espouse at IESBA: our standards must be “principle-based”, clear and globally applicable. This is something we cannot achieve on our own. We absolutely need stakeholder engagement in order to fulfill that objective.

    But this is not the only stricture for good standards. International standards, when implemented in national environments have to work well with local laws and cultures. The accountants implementing those standards may be more successful if they can depend on the work of others, for example, local standard setters, regulators, corporate governance officials, public and private sector managers etc. Ethical behavior of a single profession can multiply its effectiveness if surrounding professions also espouse and apply ethical goals.

    Let me close by saying again how pleased I am to be with you and that I consider today’s event as the start of a new series of fruitful contacts of IESBA with ANAN, PAFA members and other African stakeholders.

    Thank you very much, good health and best wishes to your endeavors.

    Dr. Stavros Thomadakis

    Chairman, International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants

    Event hosted by IFAC, ANAN and PAFA

  • A Time to Rise Collectively to the Challenge and Restore Confidence

    Tom Seidenstein
    Chair, International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board
    Institute of Chartered Accountants of India’s Virtual Conference
    English

    Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Reporting and Assurance

    Good morning from the Washington, DC, area, in the United States. I am honored to be invited to speak today. I thank the Institute and its leadership for organizing this conference. I greatly appreciate your efforts to galvanize the profession in its response to this truly global crisis. I look forward to hearing the remarks of the distinguished panelists.

    My name is Tom Seidenstein, and I currently serve as chair of the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (the IAASB). I am sorry that my first formal interaction with the Indian Institute in my current role is under these circumstances. My hope is that in the not-so-distant future, we could meet in person, in much better times. For now, please accept my best wishes for the health and well-being of those attending the conference virtually, your families, and the broader communities in which you live and serve.

    When I joined the IAASB nine months, I accepted this role with a core belief. Setting standards at the international level is the most effective way to respond to the relentless globalization of business and avoid the economic costs and regulatory arbitrage that come with a fragmentation in rules. Global approaches to global challenges. My belief in the value of global approaches remains firm. Of course, COVID-19 has created a global crisis, and the economy has been a major casualty.

    In the brief time allocated to me, my remarks will focus on three areas:

    • First, working together on both national and international levels, standard-setters, regulators, accounting and audit practitioners, preparers, and other stakeholders can make a meaningful difference in helping the economy get back on its feet.
    • Second, the IAASB stands ready to support the public interest and the external reporting community. We will create targeted guidance, where appropriate, adapt our ways of working to be flexible to rapidly changing circumstances, and coordinate with key parties.
    • Third, a few areas of our standards merit special consideration by the profession. These include going concern, auditor reporting, and auditing estimates.

    Rising to the challenge and Restoring Confidence

    I am sure that at some point this crisis will become very personal for everyone. Maybe it will be the favorite local business that needs to shut its doors. Or maybe the neighbor who loses her job. Or a friend that sadly catches the virus. I am certain that we will all be touched.

    I have been inspired by how people are responding to the crisis. It seems as if we are trying to do the best to help. I am here to say that all involved with the world of accounting and auditing have an important role to play.

    This is not the challenge that I imagined facing in my first year. However, it is the one that we collectively face, and together we should rise to meet it.

    Now more than ever, we need confidence to return in order to enable capital to flow freely again and the economy to grow. Where we sit, it is sometimes easy to get lost in the technicalities of accounting and standard setting.  However, at its best, the profession can play a critical role in ensuring trust and confidence in markets.

    Auditors are responding by adapting their ways of working and utilizing remote techniques and technology. It is no time to relax the commitment to the public interest. For the profession, this means adhering to the highest ethical standards, communicating intensively with preparers and those charged with governance, and applying both professional judgment and skepticism.

    I often say that the financial reporting world works in a highly connected ecosystem. Preparers of financial information, standard-setters, and regulators also need to each perform their role for the system to work. A weakness in any one part of the reporting ecosystem will have reverberations throughout.

    Standard setters and regulators are adapting. We do so with the recognition that we are operating in a period of enormous uncertainty, and that all judgments, even if appropriately reasoned, documented, and communicated, will not always be right in hindsight. However, we can do our best to provide greater guidance, when possible, to those trying their best to comply with our standards and rules. Standard setters need to exhibit a sense of flexibility in terms of our work program priorities and imposing additional requirements on our stakeholders.

    IAASB Standard-Setting Response: Calibrating, Reacting Agility, and Coordinating

    We at the IAASB are trying to practice what we preach. Our response is three-pronged:

    1. We are calibrating our existing program to prioritize our COVID-19 response and other leading public interest issues on our work plan, including our Quality Management work, Going Concern and Fraud, and efforts aimed at reducing complexity for Less Complex Entities. I will discuss some of our specific COVID-19 guidance shortly.
    2. We are embracing technology, as others are, to advance these priority projects and will be appropriately flexible when it comes to our previous agreed timelines. For example, we are about to publish our Exposure Draft on Group Audits. We have already agreed to an extended comment period. At our upcoming meeting in June, to be conducted via videoconference, we will discuss the impact of the current crisis on other work and effective dates.
    3. We are coordinating with national audit standard-setters, securities regulators, independent audit regulators, the International Accounting Standards Board, and professional bodies, particularly via IFAC. Our aim is to share information and discuss how we are individually responding to the crisis. We are successfully identifying areas where more work is needed and hoping to avoid redundant or confusing efforts.

    Areas of IAASB Focus to Help

    A minute earlier, I mentioned that the IAASB is developing guidance in the form of Staff Alerts to help the profession to better apply our standards. These Staff Alerts do not change the requirements of the standards. The Alerts highlight specific areas of focus under the current environment. The IAASB has already published, on its Website, a general Staff Alert aimed at broader considerations. We are developing five more on Going Concern, Auditor Reporting, the Audit of Accounting Estimates, special considerations for public sector auditors, and subsequent events.

    Let me touch on Going Concern, Auditor Reporting, and Audit of Accounting Estimates and give you a preview on what we expect to cover in our upcoming Staff Alerts. These three areas are the topics that come up most in my discussions. First, we believe our principles-based standards are robust enough to be adapted to the current environment, where there is a focus on uncertainty and judgment. We also need to keep in context the responsibilities of auditors (vis-à-vis the responsibilities of management) – neither of which is easy in these uncertain and unknown times.

    In terms of going concern, our focus is on the auditor’s understanding of management’s process for meeting the requirements of the applicable financial reporting framework. That understanding will help the auditor determine whether what management’s presentation of the financial information in the financial statement is fine, whether highlighting something in the auditor’s report is needed, or whether further modification (such as a qualification or a disclaimer) is required.

    We know in many instances this will be challenging, particularly where it is a ‘close call.’ We cannot mandate when modifications to the auditor’s report may or may not be needed (the standards set out what needs to be done). We do encourage a heightened sense of professional skepticism when undertaking this work.

    Auditors can use Auditor Reporting as another way to enhance confidence in external reporting, including in areas such as going concern. Our standards set out circumstances when an emphasis of matter is needed or another modification, including qualification, disclaimer, or an adverse opinion. There may be considerably more circumstances now where modification may be needed. In-ki alluded to various scenarios where there may be issues around gathering audit evidence. In some cases, alternative procedures may provide what is needed; in other cases, the auditor may need to consider the impact on the auditor’s report.

    Disclosure by management takes on ever increasing importance in these unprecedented times. While it will depend on the circumstances, I expect that users would expect increasing transparency related to current business risks and mitigation strategies. These disclosures will also support the work of auditors. Auditors should then focus on the relevant requirements in the financial reporting standards to ensure that appropriate and necessary disclosures are made and their impact on the auditor’s report. One area to provide further transparency is Key Audit Matters (KAMs) where they are used under ISAs. Particularly for listed companies, KAMs may play an important role in enhancing the information of the auditor’s report relating to matter that, although resolved, required significant auditor attention. KAMs may also be a useful way of highlighting some of the uncertainty and judgment needed by the auditor.

    Finally, we expect the audit of accounting estimates to become even more important over the coming months. The IAASB cannot emphasize enough the need for a heightened professional skepticism when auditing accounting estimates. Our newly revised ISA 540 helps the auditor home in on those specific inherent risks attached to estimation uncertainty. The standards and our forthcoming guidance also highlight other inherent risk factors that need to be considered, even more so now. The reality is that last year’s approach may not work for the current circumstances. We expect disclosures of estimates to be a focus for auditors, as is the testing of controls.

    Towards Better, More Confident Days

    I have outlined the IAASB’s initial response to the crisis. I say initial response, because I know that there will be twist and turns. Through our coordination efforts, we know that we will need to adapt. However, I wish to convey that the IAASB is ready to play its role in helping to rebuild confidence in the global economy. The coming days, weeks, and maybe even months will inevitably be challenging. I am pleased that we stand well positioned to do our small part.

    Remarks by IAASB Chair Tom Seidenstein